Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jimthefiend
The Coast Guard and Homeland Security are required by federal law to run security at our ports. That will not change. Nor will ANYTHING change except that now a new corporation will be in charge of administration.
The company that runs those ports now is a UK based one, and was recently purchased by the Dubai interest. Why hold them to a different standard than the UK? It's nonsense.
Congress has NO business whatsoever interfering with the sale. They have no oversight authority for business dealings made between two foreign nations, and Bush would be absolutely correct in slamming a veto on any effort to do so.
Anyone who claims this is a security threat is a fucking dipshit, no offense.
Thank you, please come again.
|
A) Bush's cock must taste good to you.
B) Congress has enough votes to override any veto.
Fact is all any dem has to do to beat a incumbant republican who doesn't vote against this is to make campaign ads showing how they agreed with Bush in letting a bunch of arab terrorist sympathizers take over our ports. Of course you don't agree with that assestment of those people but that's how it will play to ma and pa voter. And really that is all that counts