Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
Extrapolating out 1:12.
So for easy math, let's say Guba has 5 million images available (likely more, but for argument's sake...).
By your own admission, that translates to 416,000 cases of copyright infringement (in round terms).
Would this be correct?
|
Nope, your reasoning is as flawed as your courtesy.
I haven't seen 416,000 posts to GFY of content that infringes the rights of GFY members. Remember I said "For every post to content that infringes a copyright owner here on GFY, I could post a dozen images that infringe nothing...." I doubt I've seen fifty such posts, and there are easily more than fifty-times-a-dozen non-infringing images in alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage alone. Don't try to overstate my argument, I use words with extreme precision. Try to follow along.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
If, as you claim...what's currently on the market is only a "tiny, tiny part" of the overall images on Guba - then why do they even bother stealing it?
|
Still you argue as if your disputed premise had been proven. Have you ever had a course in logic? You have to establish they've stolen something before you can demand an explanation for the alleged theft. And I'm disputing the notion that GUBA steals anything.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
Stale images from the 1950s don't sell worth shit compared to the new content.
|
You would be suprised.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
the company you serve to promote - flagrantly violates copyright laws, causes loss of livelihood and income to content producers everywhere...and is undefendable at any level.
|
And yet -- wondrous miracle -- here I stand defending it and disputing your unproven accusations. Perhaps it's not quite so undefendable as all that, eh?