Quote:
|
Originally Posted by u-Bob
If they want to watermark their images to prevent copyright infrignement, all they have to do is include their logo, company name,...
If they include their url as part of the watermark, they are only doing that to get typeins...
|
I really think people have way too high ideas of type in traffic from this method, when placed on a gallery why the heck would they type in
http://www.paysitewithhotchickssuckingcock.com when right next to the picture there is an easy link saying "Click Here to go to the site" ?
Where the typein traffic comes from is for instance from the guy that saves the pics on his computer and then later only have the url on the pics to find the site again, or from those taking the pics and post them to boards or newsgroups (if they don't replace the watermark first anyways)
In the first case you might actually make an extra sale through the cookie tracking, in the second you would not, but wouldn't have anyways.
Another thing is that marking with Url will clearly show the surfer that this set belongs to the site and that will asure him that he will be able to find the rest of that set inside.