Quote:
|
Originally Posted by imageman
With all the posts about CCBILL's stats or lack of them im surprised a company like this has not made some effort to improve or upgrade their stats to bring them in line with Nats ?  |
I can sort of imagine why though.
Nats = stats for 1 program
CCBill = Absolutely fucking massive db of signups/hits etc for all the sites they process.
I'm sure they could do a good system if they wanted, but they have tools to give out for people (like nats) to do the software for them. Any CCBill-only sponsor COULD do better stats with the tools ccbill provides. It just takes effort and money.. so many opt to go with nats and get cascading while they're at it.