Originally Posted by RocHard

Q: In the history of structural engineering, steel-frame high-rise buildings have never been brought down due to fires either before or since 9/11, so how can fires have brought down three in one day? How is this possible?
A: This is the first time a fucking airliner crashed into the top of a building spreading out tens of thousands of gallons of aviation fuel.

Q: The BBC has reported that at least five of the nineteen alleged "hijackers" have turned up alive and well living in Saudi Arabia, yet according to the FBI, they were among those killed in the attacks. How is this possible?
A: My last name isn't all too common, yet I'm surprised at how many people share my full name. I'm pretty sure if this was true it would have been exposed in the first forty-eight hours. In fact, if this was true, why don't they just take some video footage of them or something to expose this "lie'.

Q: Frank DeMartini, a project manager for the WTC, said the buildings were designed with load redistribution capabilities to withstand the impact of airliners, whose effects would be like "puncturing mosquito netting with a pencil." Yet they completely collapsed. How is this possible?
A: I'm sure it was designed to withstand the impact of jetliners. However, designing something and in this case testing it is too different things. I'm pretty confident that no one has smashed jet planes into a one hundred story bulkding before. At the same time, in fact, the buildings did continue to stand. It wasn't the planes hitting the towers that brought them down, but the fire.

Q: Since the melting point of steel is about 2,700*F, the temperature of jet fuel fires does not exceed 1,800*F under optimal conditions, and UL certified the steel used to 2,000*F for six hours, the buildings cannot have collapsed due to heat from the fires. How is this possible?
A: Well, I'll just have to assume that this is true because I don't give a fuck about how hot steel needs to be before melting. First, how do we know the fire wasn't above 2,700*F? Think about all the other things that caught fire in there afterwards. Then factor in that the towers don't have any center supports; The weaight was carried by the steel on the outer edges of the bulilding. When you think that four or five floors worth of steel was destroyed when the plane hit the building PLUS the resulting fire, well, pretty much anything is possible, isn't it?

Q: Flight 77, which allegedly hit the building, left the radar screen in the vicinity of the Ohio/Kentucky border, only to "reappear" in very close proximity to the Pentagon shortly before impact. How is this possible?
A: I'm not a radar expert, but I'm pretty sure that the US doesn't have wall to wall radar coverage. Large cities like NYC might, but not every place between Ohio/Kentucky and Washington DC does. I'd imagine that these radar tracking stations aren't hooked together; They don't take a plane on radar and pass them off to another tracking station; They can't because there would be too many gaps. Also, you need to define "close proximity". Does the Pentagon have it's own radar? I doubt this. Thus, they must have been using the radar of one of the local airports which was how far away?

Q: Foreign "terrorists" who were clever enough to coordinate hijacking four commercial airliners seemingly did not know that the least damage to the Pentagon would be done by hitting its west wing. How is this possible?
A: Because terrorists are stupid and were unable to fly an airplane.

Q: A former Inspector General for the Air Force has observed that Flight 93, which allegedly crashed in Pennsylvania, should have left debris scattered over an area less than the size of a city block; but it is scattered over an area of about eight square miles. How is this possible?
A: I would imagine that anything is possible when an airplane of this size crashes. Maybe parts of the damn plane fell off as it was crashing down and the wings and the tail ended up coming down miles from where the body landed.

Q: A tape recording of interviews with air traffic controllers on duty on 9/11 was deliberately crushed, cut into very small pieces, and distributed in assorted places to insure its total destruction. How is this possible?
A: Pretty fucking simple really. They crushed the tape, cut it into little bits, and then threw the pieces up into the air or something. Not exactly fucking rocket science, is it?

Q: The Pentagon conducted a training exercise called "MASCAL" simulating the crash of a Boeing 757 into the building on 24 October 2000, and yet Condoleezza Rice, among others, has repeatedly asserted that "no one ever imagined" a domestic airplane could be used as a weapon. How is this possible?
A: How many fucking employees does the US Goverment have, how many different agencies, and is Condoleezza Rice aware of every exercise each of different agencies does four years prior. This is a simple statement that's being twisted around. Perhaps she meant to say the her fucking knitting club never imagined this could happen.