OK... that would take me a lot of energy but will do it because i like USA (not the government of course), GFY and i also want to know the whole truth some day (as all) and i hope i won't be insulted in each post with no real objections... and please read it open-minded before making any assumptions and labeling me or the theories... If you don't like the message don't "kill" the messenger...
So... September 11, 2001 was a government inside job. No other explanation makes any sense. You don't need to read conspiracy sites to understand that there's a huge cover-up and many holes in the official version etc...
Some clues. Whenever planes are hijacked in American airspace, an immediate alert goes to the U.S. Air Force to investigate. These planes are scrambled in minutes after being made aware that any plane, had been hijacked or had their transponders turned off. But four planes? Within the space of a few hours are all hijacked? And not one military plane is scrambled to investigate? Inside job? Not one military or political head did something. Instead, the military officers who were in charge of this major screw-up were promoted.
Quote:
Montague Winfield was originally scheduled to be at his command post on morning of Sept. 11. But on Sept. 10, he arranged for his deputy to relieve him the next morning at exactly 8:30 a.m. This turned out to be just eight minutes before the military was alerted to the diversion of the first flight (at 8:38 a.m. according to the timeline in The 9/11 Commission Report). The report mentions Winfield by name only once, as a source in a footnote, without clarification (Ch. 1 fn 190, p. 463). His absence from the NMCC after 8:30 a.m. was first revealed to the Commission in a June 17, 2004 statement by his deputy, Capt. Charles J. Leidig (who was recently promoted to admiral).
(See http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearin..._statement.pdf)
Winfield was scheduled to testify before the Kean Commission in public on the same day as Leidig. As on Sept. 11, he was a no-show. Leidig spoke for him, saying under oath that on Sept. 11, "Right after we resolved what was going on with United 93, around that time General Winfield took over" command of the NMCC.
(Transcript of June 17 hearings at http://www.9-11commission.gov/archiv...2004-06-17.pdf)
Thus Gen. Winfield apparently exercised no operational authority until after the attacks were over. In the further absence of Bush and Rumsfeld, the man in charge of the U.S. military during the attacks was apparently Capt. Leidig, a rookie in the job who, in his own words, first qualified in August 2001 "to stand watch as the Deputy Director for Operations in the NMCC."
However, Winfield either forgot his own absence or attempted to gloss over it when he was filmed for a 2002 Discovery-Times documentary, "Attack on the Pentagon." In that interview, he says that the "national leadership" was called to the NMCC "after the World Trade Center was struck." He also describes on camera the process of "resolving" what happened to Flight 93, the final flight, as though he was present.
Was Winfield present at the NMCC at any time during the attacks? If not, why would he try to hide an absence for which no one would otherwise think to blame him, since it was arranged the night before? Where was he during the 90 minutes after 8:30 a.m.?
|
The Pentagon is the most protected building in the world. It has its own defense system. It was obviously turned off?from within.
The WTC only burned about an hour before collapsing? I?m not a fireman, but even I know a steel building can?t collapse from the top down by what was obviously a controlled demolition. Never in the history of building fires or construction has a tall steel building ever collapsed so precisely from a structural fire, no matter how long it burned, and of course not in one hour. It?s impossible. This more than anything means inside job.
Building 7 collapsed in what also appeared to be a controlled demolition when it wasn?t even hit by any planes.
Bush?s photo op to the elementary school in Florida. Reports said that he had seen the plane hit the first tower before ever going into the school that morning, but it was not on the news until after he went inside. Considering this might be some type of terrorist attack, which they had been warned might happen from claimed earlier intelligence, the Secret Service failed in their duty to protect the President and the children in that school by allowing the photo op to take place. What he really did was to provide an alibi on national TV that he wasn?t involved.
When the second plane hit, and Bush was informed of it, that was absolute proof that this was a terrorist attack and there were other planes reported hijacked. Still Bush stayed for an additional 17 minutes putting both him and the children in Harms Way, if he truly believed it was a terrorist attack.
Then more than ever, the Secret Service should have gotten him out of that school so fast that it would have made your head spin. Instead, he grabbed a book, ?My Pet Goat.? The book was upside down, but he can't read anyway. That could explain why he bankrupted every business he was put in charge of. But that day, he very possibly didn?t realize the book was upside down.
Then when Air Force planes were finally dispatched, they were both sent in the wrong direction and not at top speed either, then I think only two were dispatched, not a whole squadron going in many different directions, and less than quarter speed of their true flying ability. The twin towers had already collapsed by the time these two planes got there. It was too little too late to do anything. But then, they were never meant to stop it.
The 19 Arabs who were supposedly on the planes and were blamed for 911, turned up alive after 9/11 or were already dead before that happened or were in jail that day.
http://www.welfarestate.com/911
The men who were reported out boozing it up the night before were very much out of character for Muslims on a suicide mission. Muslims don?t drink. Other men made sure they were seen to give credence to the planned story of who to blame it on. Reports have since surfaced that the men were really Mossad agents. The Mossad had a interest in making sure 9/11 happened so it was a pretext to start a war in the Middle East and to keep their allies, Bush etc in power.
The buildings of the attack should have been treated as crime scenes, they were not. The steel in the buildings hit were not subjected to forensics to determine what made them collapse. Instead, the steel was shipped off to a foreign country to be recycled so this was not possible. Obvious cover-up.
Bush and Cheney ordered Congress not to investigate it. Yes, Congress was told to not investigate 9/11. Inside job, doesn?t it? Since Congress never really investigated it other than the 9/11 Commission which was a total joke, it wasn?t investigated except to back up the government?s story which had so many holes in it that it couldn?t hold water. Yet, many believed it.
I have read other reports that tall buildings often have explosive charges placed in the building as it is being constructed so it can later be brought down in a controlled demolition in case it becomes obsolete.
It was also reported that trucks were seen that morning carrying out huge amounts of gold bullion from the back of the WTC. A bank heist, too? The Federal Reserve was located in the building. Remember the movie, Die Hard III, where a bomb scare in a school was used as a diversion to loot the Federal Reserve bank of it?s gold? They would most definitely want to protect the gold and would remove it so it wouldn?t be lost when the building was brought down. Again inside job.
What is pointed out in the link below is that a much smaller plane was used on the Pentagon than was used on the twin towers. Why the difference? Why did the plane only hit a small portion of the Pentagon? Why not dive bomb right into the middle of it?
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/boeing.htm
Osama Bin Laden was a close friend of the Bush family. The day after 9/11, when ALL aircraft were grounded throughout the United States, two military planes criss-crossed the country, picking up members of the Bin Laden family and taking them to safety in the Middle East.
The FBI admitted that they had concocted the story about the existence of "Al-Qaeda", but the press still reports it today as the world's major terrorism organisation (not 'The Mossad') and brainwashed individuals admit to belonging to it...
On this website, they have a poll asking five questions. Of those 5 questions, one blames it only on Osama bin Laden, and the government was not involved at all. Only 13.2% of the people who took that poll believed the lie.
http://www.letsroll911.org
Also:
http://www.lewisnews.com/article.asp?ID=106623
This is very well written article, which is by Vietnam Combat Pilot and Commercial Airline Pilot Who Confirms 9/11 was an Government inside job.
This link gives 100 websites that claim a different version of the truth than the Government story.
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/#LINKS
They can?t all be wrong, especially when the governments version never made any sense if you analyse it at all.
[see next post]