Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SleazyDream
ummm, if he had the 2257 docs he would post them - no?
without posting the docs i tend to believe epassport.
|
He said he sent them to epassporte , and they said they were "altered" , they wouldnt say they were "altered" if they hadn't seen them.. I think the onus is on epassporte to provide him with what is "altered". The pictures are up on several sites.. so obviously a contract exists in some fashion and there is a content provider that has a legal right to sell them no ? If epassporte's position is merely about 2257 then i can understand the problem.. just as any biller would.