jayeff

And apparently did, although later Chris Mallick claimed that the release had been altered. In that it is the site owner with whom Chris is refusing to do business and he didn't suggest any wrong-doing on the part of the content provider, he effectively implied that the site owner had made the changes.

We are all aware that ePassporte can choose to do business (or not) with anyone they want. But whether it is professional to exercise that choice depends on the circumstances and despite 5 pages of drama, those circumstances are still not clear.

Was the model release altered? If so, by whom? If it was altered by the owner(s) of bikinibabes.tv then certainly that is a dishonest business no-one should want to deal with. If the release was altered by the content provider and eP demonstrated that clearly to the owner(s) of bikinibabes, asking (as opposed to demanding) the pictures be removed, but ran into a brick wall, their refusal to do business was still marginally reasonable.

But in the very first post of this thread the site owner wrote "I... asked the content provider of the sets to contact Epassporte and the sort the mess out. I was 100% sure the content was ok to use - and even more sure a respectable content provider wouldn't forge legal documents just to sell a set lol. Well it turns out all the docs are correct and ok". If that was the truth and nothing has emerged in this thread to prove otherwise, then eP's decision, admirable as it may be to want to protect an employee/friend from their own foolishness, was very unprofessional, not least because it affects affiliates of the program, as well as its owner(s).

Okay, but what does it have to do with this thread? Even if we stay on topic I doubt we shall ever find out who has been telling us lies, so why confuse things further? It's already likely that while claiming to be defending a friend, since you have nothing more solid to contribute than anyone else here, you have kept the thread going twice as long as would otherwise have happened.