Quote:
|
Originally Posted by punker barbie
what if this girl was told the shoot was a calendar, an ad, something other than a porn site? what if she in fact did do a mainstream shoot but some one rotten decided to resell the pics to a bikini porn site???
i get the drift there is more to this story. i'd suggest just take down the god damn pictures make your affiliates happy and be able to pay them by epass and everyone in the end is smiling  |
Actually, legally, unless the model release specifies exactly where the photos can be used, if it's a general release, it doesn't matter where the girl was TOLD the photos would go, they belong to the person who shot them and is the other party of the release. She legally wouldn't have a leg to stand on, and it would be her own fault for not reading the release properly. Her ONLY recourse would be to sue the person who shot the content and prove in some way that she was under "duress" to sign the document (mentally incompetant, on drugs or alcohol, etc), and to have the document nullified in a court of law.
What a load of bullshit, Epass, grow the fuck up.