GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Why Grapplers will beat strikers 9 outta 10

xxxdesign-net · 01-26-2006, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chadglni

You have 0 clue what you are talking about. The guy wasn't "exhausted and harmless" he could have beaten every one of them one at a time in a row without being "exhausted and harmless".

I did some boxing.. when a guy start throwing punches with less power than my grand-mother could throw, that's a sure sign that the guy is exhausted... and the only reason he was still beating the crap out of the other guy is because the other was equaly exhausted... But you are free have fantasies..

Quote:

As far as top boxers beating BJJ guys you are fucking lost. There is a reason boxers stay in the ring, with gloves and a ref. There is also a reason they can't kick, tackle, or anything else. Straight boxing is the pussiest of all fights and you try to compare them to MMA fighters?

wow, those are powerful arguments

Case closed I guess

Oh.. and if Tank Abbot could beat some of the best MMA fighters.. A top boxer could do even better with a bit of training.... As far as I know, bjj guys also do some boxing training? I never implied that a boxer should just be thrown in a fight with a MMA fighter without proper training...

The debate here were striker agaisnt grapplers .. A boxer with some basic MMA training is still a striker...