Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rabbit
the paysites that really get the raw end of the stick in review site scenario are not those that get a bad score. its those who's keyword is most popular.
'busty amateur boobs' is not a big keyword. chances are you're getting many times more traffic from review sites which initially comes from SEs through keywords like 'big naturals' and 'busty adventures' to name a few.
i dont agree that lack of hardcore should penalize a paysite. we don't.
and you have every right to provide whichever product you feel makes you the most money. but review site's job is to take the consumers pov. so your options are:
1. refuse reviews
2. use them to improve your product and compete against other sites
3. status quo, but then don't complain  |
We do refuse new review sites, we don't kill current webmasters for something I allowed. We can't really improve much more. Size/volume/revshare program, members seem to stay pretty happy and not bitch about content/updates, which is what most review sites nail us on.
You kind of make my point, if the traffic "started off" looking for score-land in google, found your site at the #1 or #2 slot, didn't like your review, then found my review and joined, yeah, it's not really fair. However, if it was a standard visitor hitting your site, maybe they thought they wanted score but found they liked my site, then so be it, fair fight for the traffic.
I understand the person may not have joined score anyway, but they could have, and I just ripped it from them. I don't find it fair.
I do see both ways guys