View Single Post
Old 01-06-2006, 12:35 PM  
broke
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Someplace Windy
Posts: 4,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by eroswebmaster
LOL so. If you had a kid then 100% of that would be going to taking care of your child.
No -- it wouldn't and doesn't.

Thanks for playing.


If 100% went towards taking care of the "children", I'd have no 401K, no IRA, no Roth IRA, no car, and wouldn't eat or drink.
__________________
Perfect Gonzo

Last edited by broke; 01-06-2006 at 12:36 PM..
broke is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote