Quote:
Originally posted by SykkBoy2
oh THIS would be fun to enforce...checking each and every referring page and trying to track where their traffic comes from....
splitting the bank? so, ok, sponsors split the bank with you....so, can I, as a sponsor then also make you split MY costs of enforcement? Will you pay part of my hosting bills to DESERVE this bank? Maybe the bank should be split only amongst those sending more than 100 joins per month?
trade union?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA never going to happen, NEVER...
the egos in this business would never let one of the other players decide how they do business...and who would decide the rules? YOU? how about me? I draw some ire from GFY Sensitivity Police for my views....should we use MY views?
What if I don't think spam is bad? what if I think fake rape and fake incest sites are not so bad? what if think everyone should have at least one bestiality site? Remember what one wise person said and more have quoted "You can't even get a group of webmasters to decide where to go for dinner..."
Hey, let's let [Labret] decide what HE wants as a standard for our industry...how about The Hun? Who votes on the issues? who elects our "leaders"? What if I don't like what the leaders propose?
Why should it just be sponsors who try to limit TGP's? what about the webmasters who submit? don't THEY also have the power? without submissions, what where would TGP's egt their content?
as long as they get their traffic counters spun, webmasters will still submit to TGP's...as long as legit sales come in, sponsors will keep letting them come in....
|
very good points sykkboy, i was thinking similar.
you shaved me a bunch of typing.
