Who do they think they are, they remind me of food critics, complete wankers.
What gives them them the right to call themselves a reviewer, what is there some sort of porn school that they go to, to class themselves as a reviewer.
This below statement is taken from
www.thebestporn.com
If you like em young, innocent, and somewhat expensive!"
(+) Cute innocent looking amateur girl.
(+) Nice sized pics.
(-) Too much softcore.
(-) Too expensive.
I wont mention the site, but the site is a huge site and one of the best sites out there, what gives them the right to say that there is to much softcore, thats what the members want, they dont want to see 10 dicks rammed up her butt, so why is that a negative.
Then they said that the site was to expensive, again, what gives them the right to say that, the site is $ 29.95 per month and you get access to 15 other sites in their network and the content is exclusive, if it was up to me i would be charging $ 99.00 per month.
Do these clowns know how much it cost to produce content or better still how much it cost to market a big network of sites.