View Single Post
Old 12-29-2005, 02:11 PM  
tony286
lurker
 
tony286's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: atlanta
Posts: 57,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion
That is not technically or "realistically" true.
In class action suits like this, it does actually give a blanket injunction to all "pornographers". DOJ knows it can't start going out and selectively prosecuting NON FSC members. Why? Because even if they got a conviction, it would be appealed and over turned because you cannot have a selected member of our populace that has protection simply based on membership in an organization and the rest of the population not.
THats funny you telling a lawyer the law. lol
tony286 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote