Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
I understand why some want to keep this section of the porn business as a cottage industry but that will not happen. What ever the 2257 law ends up like.
Video, Cable, Magazines are all run from offices and the judge must have thought "If you can't afford one that's your problem" This shoots down the privacy issue in a second.
As for him thinking that somewhere there are images of under age performers, well that's just logical while you have 1,000s of people buying and publishing content with little or no records.
4 performers were caught with 2257, without it what number would that have risen to?
2257 is not a guaranty it's 100% legal. But until someone comes up with something better it's ALL WE HAVE TO PROTECT OURSELVES FROM THE LESS THAN HONEST PERFORMER OR PRODUCER.
|
Actually read a book on the history of porn before 2257 they asked for id's ,the industry didnt want children in porn production's. Traci Lords who caused 2257 to happen had presented two forms of government id at her shoots showing her of age. Thats why no one was arrested for Traci Lords because she showed valid id. People have to stop accepting when they put us in with child pornographers.