Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gornyhuy
OH man thats good to hear that they specifically addressed the secondary producer issue.
|
I think this last year served as a warning to a lot of people. And over all it was a good thing.
The idea that you can publish porn, soft or hard, without ascertaining the content is legal is beyond crazy and no defense in a court of law if you're up for publishing child porn or being sued by the model.
225 documents are by no means 1005 cover, but neither is my car seat belt 100% going to save my life. But I have all the documents for all the porn I publish ad always belt up.
I think what this does for secondary producers is free them from the over burdensome job of cross referencing and listing URLs.
Will some continue to buy content trusting another person to have the documents?
Will people continue to drive without seat belts. But because one idiot does it is no excuse for the other idiots.