not particularly bad moneywise for the swanksoft. Should just make it clear that they're listed for non payment. Also, it would be a good idea to contact them to see if the webmasters account was cancelled for cheating or other tos, etc. You run the show, but just my 2 cents, would be worth more of a read & more valuable if you wrote things on each sponsor, such as, the webmasters source of traffic, wether it was tgp/mgp/ll, free sites, ppc se, 404, exits, popups? etc. any email/contact/correspondence had, etc
The swanksoft one, moneywise I really don't think it's so shitty 1:87 isn't bad. Seems the problem is no payment since 04/05 & there may be a reason for that. Have the webmaster that submitted this forward you any correspondence he may have sent the sponsor & write up info if he emailed them, how many times, if & what the response was, etc.. more details will help the credibility if they really are a SHIT sponsor. You want visitors to believe they are shit, then more details to sell them on the facts.
