View Single Post
Old 12-28-2005, 09:30 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
So far, it seems like a big win for webmasters over the incredibly ridiculous burdens they were looking to apply (ie. seconday recordkeepers).. BUT, remember, existing 10+ year 2257 still applies to all webmasters...and this is just the 10th circuit.

What has not changed is the responsibility to be able to point DOJ to the content producer of any image you carry on your website.

So if you are playing the "knock knock, it's DOJ " game at home, look at any image on your site, and see if you can identify which content producer that is listed on your 2257.html page that image belongs to.

If you can't do that, then doesn't matter that the secondary recordkeeper requirements have been knocked down, you still have a 2257 problem.


Fight the rain on the parade!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote