Quote:
|
Or the Supreme Court of The State of Florida.
|
The Florida Supreme Court did not take sides on the issue, they only said they don't feel they have jurisdiction. I dont know the details on this, but I'll try to get more and put it up on freechris.org.
Quote:
The court has only accepted a motion to whether Chris should be released on bail. I don't think the court will be accepting testimony on the motion. They will simply review the case file and briefs. I don't know of an instance where the supreme court would actually take evidence or testimony.
The only time I know of that the supreme court would preside over a case is when the chief justice presides as the Senate acts as jurors in an impeachment hearing.
|
Correctomundo. The US supreme court is not presiding over the merits of the case itself (yet). This motion is simply addressing the bail revokation and detaining of Chris. If they rule in Chris's favor, the trial will go on as planned, by Polk County, the only difference is Chris will not be held in Jail while awaiting trial.
Like I said I will try to get some more information and get it up there.