Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 2HousePlague
It sounds good, Aaron, and I think you're right in general principle -- marketing is going to get emotional -- but, The bonds we may yet have to old jingles or, brands, sensations from our youth, have likely weakened and grown indistinct in their ability to tug us towards specific types of purchases. What we should be now is the opposite of emotional, most especially in the planning of the "faces we present", be they to serve marketing purposes, corporate image, personal image, brand name choices, advertising image choice (licensing trace), etc.
But the tone of your enquiry has drawn an overly-cautionary sounding response from me, Aaron. That was not my intent.
What I mean is, acquire all that good stuff and come talk to me once you have.
2hp
|
A critical harmonization of occured marketing practises can generate a plethora of strategic scopes, axioms and methods that will liberate from all emotional phenomenons. A gnostic approach in this sphere was didactic in the past. A epistemological strategy, synonymous to planning, is not a panacea in itself; it is rather a policy. Under the mode of a macroscopic analysis of a cosmopolitan organization and isolated from any phobia we can emphasize to the systematic logistics and master the illuminating plethora of dilemmas and risks without reaching an oxymoron paradox. This era of events is characterized by dynamism, dictated by their parallel enthusiasm in practicing strategic theory.
I apologize for having tyrannized you with my hellenic phraseology reminding you the microscopic energy of english language
