|
The slavery argument regarding slavery in the New Testament just doesn't hold water - the reasons for slavery were always given with quotes from the Old Testament particularly regarding the story of Ham and his people.
If not the Jews then who else is a different story.
Labret has always argued his points very well but has never answered this or given his opinion.
If the Jews do not have a claim to the area then who does?
The evidence regardless of religious evidence seems to be overwhelminlgly in the Jews favor.
The only other group of interest would be the Palestinians and when offered the chance to fight for their land in World War 1 they turned it down - they did not beleive the land to belong to them in the same way that you and I understand borders and nationalism.
To accept the Palestinians right to have the land you have to take the same type of religious proof that the Zionist will offer, they have no better or worse, they simply have their tales and stories.
Eventually it must come down to a relevancy of ownership - who are the people who have a historical presence of ownership in the area - and again I beleive the overwhelming proof leads to the Jews.
|