Quote:
Originally posted by Hooper
---
I believe that promoting rape is both immoral and illegal and i dont do business those who promote it.
Aside from your personal view of me or my "light"... What do you believe Sly_RJ?
A simple "yes i think its ok to promote rape" or "no i dont think its ok" will do.
|
once again...promoting rape fantasy is not "illegal."
It may be however "immoral," but doing anything in porn is considered "immoral" by the majority of the public.
If you can't see this man you are much more jaded by the almighty dollar than anyone you disagree with here.
And no it does not boil down to "yes I think it's ok to promote rape" or "no I don't think it's ok."
We live in a world that is not black and white...there are many....many shades of grey...and one of them sadly is rape FANTASY.
If a program or sponsor chooses not to associate with wm's that promote rape fantasy etc that is their choice and I will defend that.
If you as a wm do not wish to promote rape fantasy or work with any sponsors that do, that is your choice and I will defend that.
But if someone chooses to open up or promote a rape fantasy site knowing full well the baggage it comes with, and the potential cost to their business rep as well as their actual income fighting off legal battles, then that is their (at this point) LEGAL choice and I too will defend that.
I will not defend the subject matter, only their right to produce and disseminate it based upon our 1st amendment rights to free speech.
And yes the sites in your arsenal are up for debate.
You came on here questioning or as you stated judging and opening up the floor for other wm's to judge this wm and the sponsors he pushes.
You have been shown to be a hypocrite. You want free speech but only when it protects your income.
I think taking someone's image and photoshopping their face onto another person's body is wrong and immoral...but that's just an opinion.
You would not appreciate if they were doing this to you and plastering pics of you all over the net taking a dick up your ass or down your throat.
The teen site in your portfolio actually has the words 'Highschool Honeys" on it.
Sure there are 18+ girls in highschool but still I would never push anything that promoted girls in "Highschool," because you, me and everyone else on this board knows that encompasses alot.
Highschool girls could be anywhere from 14-19 but did you specify that they were 18 year old highschool honeys?...NO.
The not so subtle implication is underage, but of course for fantasy purposes.
But hey...as long as you have 18+ chicks on your site with documentation and you don't actually come out and say they are underage you're cool in the eyes of the law...you are right legally (maybe) but what about morally?