|
My take on this is simple. A lot of the budgets I've been offered to shoot solo girl sites are worth us bothering with.
100 set + 8 hours of video for $20,000 is the price one guy quotes. He then boasts about shooting this on a schedule that would kill him or a model, creatively. So is he just churning it out or creating something with texture, depth and appeal?
What suffers for most of these sites is the budget for the content.
Girls get tired and bored sitting naked with their legs open all day, there are only so many time she can fake an orgasm on camera and make it mean something.
Then there is the photographer.
Shooting all day long at a pace that leaves you breathless means your creative juices dry up after 3-5 hours. Then it's auto pilot and you have the prospect of doing it all again tomorrow and for the next week.
Then we have problems with locations, props and clothing, exactly how many times can you shoot the same girl in the same location and keep it interesting?
Now you have the problem of actually finding a model who will be a cut above the rest. Most girls in this business do it for the money and only the money. They get little fun out of it, no pleasure and the work is "Soul Less". Multiply that by the fact that she only pretty, the shooter's tired and probably not on the top of his profession and you end up with "FILLER CONTENT"
So why do sites do it?
Try opening any other site with $20,000 and there is your answer.
As for the formula of 4-5 sales a day cutting it, that's a joke.
4-5 sales, less processing is $114 a day. Assuming you are giving affiliates something lets say you have $60 a day. $1,800 a month. Less hosting of $400 leaves $1,400 a month.
|