Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo
I think a larger selection is nice because as someone said earlier, each one is a seperate niche. It amazes me when people call them ugly, fat, or whatever. Solo girls have their unique features whether it be being pale, a big nose, or really short hair. Perhaps 95% of the population isn't into them, but that 5% that is will sign up. It's about finding the girl that just has that look. You can't tell me girls like Tiffany Teen are the hottest girls you've ever seen? Dressed normally, she'd just be a cute girl you see at the mall. However, she had that look that just got guys.
My only problem with the mass amounts of them is that many are low quality inside. Not much content, no customer interaction, and almost a short term solution. I can see why a lot of these sites don't retain well.
The quality ones that update, have interaction, and quality content inside retain extremely well. Ask anyone that has promoted Jordan Capri or Tawnee Stone over the years. Those girls retain.
I guess I'm saying that more sites are good and ensure no girl gets oversaturated. However, since most are revshare, it'd be nice to see the quality improve.
|
I agree. The web needs more Allie's and Vanilla Deville's. Real sites run by real women. That's the key to rentention.
The funny thing is alot of these so called solo girl sites of some of our Twistys girls have less sets than we have of the model. We have a few models with 60+ different photosets. We have 1500 models like that and charge the same or less than these sites. Then they wonder why retention sucks.