Originally Posted by chodadog

Dd you even read what you just quoted?

"no serious proof has ever been produced to challenge the accepted date of 1769."

And since there's no serious proof, you feel as though you can declare he was actually born in 1768 and was thus not French? Of course his detractors are going to make up shit about him. Are you not at all familiar with politics? Find me a serious piece of evidence that the man was actually born in 1768. He was French. This thread is stupid.