Quote:
Originally posted by Phil21
Same goes to sponsors who let "cheaters" keep sending in signups. Bah, all that traffic should be going to a "permission denied" or something page, or at the very least a 5 second redirect link that lets the WM know he's not getting paid. Underhanded practice at best, makes you just as bad as the cheater himself. "hrm, we could cut off his account, or we could just NOT PAY on it, and make cash since we don't have to pay him!".
|
Hello Phil, please take your head out of your ass and use your brain.
The two events are totally unrelated.
IBill has a contract with their clients. They are a billing service. If they have clients who attempt to defraud them (and it happens trust me) then IBill should not pay those clients a dime. But that is not what happened here.
Why should sponsors kill cheaters hits? If I paid a guy $100 bucks that he stole from me, I should not be allowed to recoup my money? It's not coming back from the cheater, that's for damn sure.
This is business, not charity.