chadglni

I'll give you a recap. Amy posted she was suspended. ImLive responded that it was possible she committed fraud.

(All is well up to this point, assuming or saying possible is perfectly acceptable)

Then they screw up.

"She never earned the amounts that appeared on the forged checks on which her name appeared and that were cashed by HER (by her own written admission against interest - easily admissible in court actually - good thinking Amy"

You see, Amy never said she cashed the forged checks. She said she cashed the last two checks that were sent to her by ImLive. Nobody knows who tried to pass the bad checks.

And here it is again.

"Amy has not denied cashing the forged checks - quite the contrary. Based on her own written admissions in this posting including her claim to have earned the fraudulent payments, one can only reasonably conclude that Amy was the architect of the fraud (or at least a proud participant) which was attempted against us. Under local law forgery is a class D felony (NRS 205.090) for which the minimum period of incarceration is 1 year with a maximum period of 4 years (NRS 193.130) assuming we are talking only about one count and assuming there was no conspiracy underlying her actions. Amy, sometimes it's better to shut up and move on than to confess to a felony in public."

But she had denied cashing bad checks, FROM THE VERY BEGINNING!

_____

Enter CDSmith and a few dozen others to say because ImLive is a stand up company they'll wait to see what happens. Nevermind that they accused her of committing a crime without proof on a public forum and twisted it to appear she admitted to it.