Quote:
|
Originally Posted by theking
Speculative "analysis"...as I have seen this "analysis" explained away...with different "analysis". The only phyiscal evidence in existence all indicates that Oswald was involved...and I repeat...everything else presented is innuendo...speculation...theory that may or may not even add up to "circumstantial" evidence. I repeat extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence.
|
ummm, isn't it a little difficult to prove others were involved if no one was even legally accused?