Quote:
|
Originally Posted by will76
This is the exact reason why ClickCash doesn't post on the boards. Imlive felt obligated to defend themselves here when this is not the time or place to discuss these matters. A professional response would have been something to the effect " This is an ongoing situation and will not be discused with anyone other then the parties involved muchless on a messageboard." or the best thing would have been to not reply at all.
People bait these companies into pissing matches all the time and most companies take the bait. In this case they not only took the bait but I think they hooked themselves as well.
It doesn't matter who started it, but who participates in it and comes out looking like the biggest fool.  |
I can't say I disagree with what you're saying here. It is only natural to respond in these situations. In the first post ImLive was basically insulted and accused of wrongdoing... it is only natural for the owner to try to respond to that, at least to a small degree so as not to seem evasive or avoiding, or hiding. And the central point to the ImLive side IS the possible fraud/forgery, so how do you explain your side and
not mentioning it?
It's been a few weeks now, and both sides are wisely silent about the issue. I'm sure lawyers and the banks involved will figure out what really happened and the issue will be settled as all are eventually. Until then I suppose it's fun to speculate from the cheap seats. :D
For the record though, both sides brought things to the thread that they probably shouldn't have, not just ImLive.
Lastly, a few people on this thread (specifically posts #21, 160, and 182) taking opportunisitic cheap shots, making ridiculous comments and/or spamming your shit at the expense of the company being attacked is downright lowlife scum behavior.
Nothing else to say here except to wait to hear the outcome, if any.
Done.