Originally Posted by traffic addict

Of course traffic addict is ImLive's representative...
These are Imlive's formal responses.

Amy did make a lot of money on the site in the past but these two checks were fakes and are being investigated by our bank.
She never earned the amounts that appeared on the forged checks on which her name appeared and that were cashed by HER (by her own written admission against interest - easily admissible in court actually - good thinking Amy).

Amy - getting a lawyer is your first smart move.

ImLive has actually never issued a check to any host in the amounts appearing on those forged checks. Furthermore, all of the checks ever sent to Amy were paid.

As we and our bank have determined, there are a number of indicators of forgery versus the electronically produced standard checks issued by the thousands by ImLive annually:

The signature is wrong. The date is written in the wrong format. The details of the bank are wrong. We could go on with more indicators, but for reasons of bank secrecy (and to avoid giving more clues to the next generation of forgers) we prefer not to reveal all of the indicators.
We and the bank would of course be ready to do it if requested by the local prosecutor.

We were very impressed by the speed with which your lawyer gave you an answer Amy, but frankly we think 56 minutes for your lawyer to provide you with an expert opinion on your case (as your postings indicate) is inadequate in light of the criminal penalties you face.