View Single Post
Old 11-24-2005, 06:33 PM  
SilentKnight
Megan Fox's fluffer
 
SilentKnight's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: shooting pool in Elysium
Posts: 24,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by venus
well I have the E10, I have had it since it first came out, thinking of upgrading to something better, the E10 is 4 moega pixel and the canon is 8, so I would assume it would take better pictures overall ?
When you say "better", you're talking in terms of what? Image clarity? Resolution? Lighting? Color saturation? Composition?

It also depends on what media you're shooting for. Anything over 4mP is overkill for the web IMO. Sure, 8mP is better for large format prints, and also gives a little more latitude for cropping.

I've not worked with a 20d myself, so I don't have a firsthand comparative basis. But I've seen the work of a lot of colleagues with 20d's...and online they're impossible to differentiate between the 20d and the e10. But again, it comes down to the skill and talent of the photographer involved.
SilentKnight is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote