Quote:
	
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Fucksakes
					
				 believe me when I say this... when you do enough research on the INTERWEB you seem to get mixed up information, I even read in a few places that the extra skin doesnt have extra sensors etc.
 when I read on the web from ppl against it, they make it sound like fucking hell and of coarse I say fuck that, no way do I want to harm my baby, and than when I talk to my doctor, he says it will not hurt the baby.
 
 According to a comprehensive study, newborn responses to pain are "similar to but greater than those observed in adult subjects" (p. 1326) [2]. Circumcision is overwhelmingly painful and traumatic [3, 4]. Some infants do not cry because they go into traumatic shock from the overwhelming pain of the surgery [5]. No experimental anesthetic has been found to be safe and effective in preventing circumcision pain in infants [3]. Changes in pain response due to newborn circumcision have been demonstrated at six months of age, suggesting lasting neurological effects and a symptom of post-traumatic stress disorder.
 
 the following statement here is false, says my doctor:
 No experimental anesthetic has been found to be safe and effective in preventing circumcision pain in infants
 | 
	
 One thing that you should note which complicates the issue is that sometimes doctors who encourage it are actually benefactors of it. They make money selling forskins for research etc. Good money is made on human tissue.
If you feel it's so important, get the opinions of 3 or 4 doctors and go with 'majority rule'.