View Single Post
Old 11-17-2005, 10:03 PM  
lazycash
Troll Patrol
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Local Socal
Posts: 15,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
So... Amy's ImLive account was only "put on hold" while they needed time to investigate what the bank was telling them.

Conclusion: there was no need for this thread.

At the very least it was grossly premature, and comes off reading like a retaliatory strike with a hint of vindictiveness to it.

If Amy is going to be charged, I think it would be better served to wait and see how it turns out before making judgement calls or calling the integrity of Pussycash/ImLive into question, of which they have thus far shown and exemplary amount of.

I do know that if I had two cheques in hand that my bank was saying were counterfeit I would certainly be suspending the account of the person whose name appears on said cheques immediately as well, and would be looking into it like Traffic Addict is. I seriously doubt that anyone here would do any different.
Agreed, as well as I don't think Imlive should have brought any of the details of the situation until they had reached a conclusion on the investigation. Amy may have had no part in the supposed fraud, but Imlive posting this detailed info makes it appear that she is clearly committing fraud.
lazycash is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote