Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CDSmith
So... Amy's ImLive account was only "put on hold" while they needed time to investigate what the bank was telling them.
Conclusion: there was no need for this thread.
At the very least it was grossly premature, and comes off reading like a retaliatory strike with a hint of vindictiveness to it.
If Amy is going to be charged, I think it would be better served to wait and see how it turns out before making judgement calls or calling the integrity of Pussycash/ImLive into question, of which they have thus far shown and exemplary amount of.
I do know that if I had two cheques in hand that my bank was saying were counterfeit I would certainly be suspending the account of the person whose name appears on said cheques immediately as well, and would be looking into it like Traffic Addict is. I seriously doubt that anyone here would do any different.
|
Agreed, as well as I don't think Imlive should have brought any of the details of the situation until they had reached a conclusion on the investigation. Amy may have had no part in the supposed fraud, but Imlive posting this detailed info makes it appear that she is clearly committing fraud.