View Single Post
Old 11-16-2005, 08:45 PM  
Libertine
sex dwarf
 
Libertine's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 17,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by Temp1
First of all, it's not 'my survey' nor did I attest that it's what constitutes good sex. It was in respect to comments about the issue discussed in the survey.
Apparently, next to not being able to read properly, you are also unable to remember your own posts.

Quote:
Here, knock yourselves out with data opposed to 'my female friend that speaks for 99% of other women' (survey link)

You opposed data on dick size to a statement by a woman on good sex. By your own admission.

That means you did equate the issue of dick size to that of good sex.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Temp1
Second, it's rather ironic that you would believe issues of IQ and gene pool would be on your side, considering the substance of your original post and subsquent posts. You could have said something like 'My female friend made this ignorant comment, can you believe how some people buy into foolish stereotypes'. You actually validated her ignorance by seeking second opinions.
The whole purpose of this thread was to find out more about the prevalence of the stereotype, you illiterate donkey.

If you want to find out if a stereotype actually exists, you do that by asking about it, not by condemning it.

Of course I know it's a stupid stereotype that has no bearing on reality. Duh. That's why the very first post in this thread, which you very clearly didn't read, specifically asks for opinions on whether or not many women BELIEVE this stereotype. NOT if the stereotype is TRUE.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Temp1
Third, your ad hominem attack on me rather than arguing the post might shed some light on your limited capacity.
It wasn't an ad hominem, moron. Insulting someone amid an otherwise rational argumentation does not constitute an ad hominem fallacy. The ad hominem fallacy specifically excludes the presence of actual arguments.

I, however, did present a number of arguments. I just larded them with insults because it pisses me off when I have to explain the obvious to the likes of you.

So when I conclude these arguments by saying that you're a moron, an idiot, a fucking retard, an illiterate ape, a brain damaged donkey or the intellectual equivalent of a vegetable, I am not making an ad hominem fallacy, I am just adding some very appropriate insults to my argumentation.
I do not discount the things you say because you are an idiot, rather, I refute them, and then call you an idiot for saying such idiotic things.
__________________
/(bb|[^b]{2})/

Last edited by Libertine; 11-16-2005 at 08:47 PM..
Libertine is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote