View Single Post
Old 11-09-2005, 01:36 AM  
Myst
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 4,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetaMan
where is the second part? i cant find it specifically in the article i want to read what it says to go along with it.

nm no i didnt.

where is the part about HAD an erect posture?
the quote u posted 'they probably had an erect posture for walking' is the guy giving a probable reason why they had an erect posture (for walking). but they did in fact have an erect posture. you are reading the sentance as 'they probably had an erect posture for walking'
read it as 'they probably had an erect posture for walking'.
__________________
ICQ: 298-523-037
Myst is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote