Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MetaMan
a Neanderthal and an ape are different, there is no concrete proof of the link between an ape and a human.
the difference is the upright spine, there is no fossils with the missing link, thus it is called MISSING LINK, there is only scientists who have filled in the gaps with what they thought "could be".
i do not care how close out DNA is, i have heard this argument before.
there is still a 2.5% genetic difference.
|
a neanderthal represents that missing link. it stood upright and had a slightly curved spine. it was the 'early human' if you will.
have you seen joan of ark? that scene where the man tells her 'of all the millions of possibilities that the sword could have come into the field.. you chose to believe this one..'. thats you.
you say there is no concrete proof that apes and humans came from the same ancestor. thats because we cannot go back in time and see it for ourselves. but there is so much evidence that suggests they did, and almost none to suggest they didnt. the evidence is there, its very clear. from the way mammals develop to the way they think and act to their dna sequences, there is so much evidence to suggest there was a common ancestor. and yet you choose to believe that humans were created entirely different, with absolutely no evidence