Quote:
|
Originally Posted by potter
My argument had nothing to do with whether one can prove their existence. Did you even read my post s? That was an exclamation about the logic you used. Let me break it down for you so there is no way to dodge my questions anymore. With this being the third time I am asking you. Please try to answer my question.
What you are saying here is basically. "Evolution cannot become a law, because it is based off the big bang theory, which cannot be proven". Correct? Please let me know if I've misunderstood you here.
So with that(again), My question(s) is. Why does it matter where we came from to make evolution law? What does evolution have to do with the big bang theory?
And for the record, the comment about whether I could prove I exist, was ripping on this comment of yours
With your logic, anyone who believed the big bang theory could not be proven to exist as the underlying assumption of their creation could not be proven.  |
Why does it matter where we came from to make evolution law ?
Because that is what the theory of evolution tries to explain where we came from.
What does evolution have to do with the big bang theory?
Our space time existance is the environment in which we came into being. Since evolutionary theory defines our existance as genetic survival of traits based on the ENVIRONMENT in which the organizm lives, anything that defines how that ENVIROMENT comes into being is relevant.
Considering that Darwin's theory of Evolution WAS/IS a counter theorem your lack of understanding about counter theorem is really scary.