View Single Post
Old 11-08-2005, 11:28 AM  
GigoloMason
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 742
Quote:
Originally Posted by punkworld
You don't need to disprove something to disregard something as unscientific, irrational and irrelevant. Since creationism fails to provide any useful predictions, it is untestable,
All philosophy fails to provide any sort of useful predictions in a scientific sense.

Quote:
and therefore unscientific (know your Popper).
That's probally why it's not called science.

Quote:
Since it is not based on any empirical inference or logical deduction, and there is a much stronger competitive theory, believing in it is irrational.
What would that competative theory be?
__________________
GigoloMason is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote