Originally Posted by Paul Markham

How do you justify this to be about race?

South Africa is run by blacks and doing well. India is run by Indians and doing well, china and S. Korea is run by Orientals and doing well.

The problem has little to nothing to do with race, it's about culture. You are pulling the race card in a desperate effort to avoid replying to my statements.

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

Starvation anf famine is natures way of saying, "You have too many people living off the land you have."

Now whether you can teach them to use the land better or to stop killing each other is another mute point.

I lived through the 50 and 60 when most of africa was rebelling to get rid of the evil white colonialists. So how much better have the black rulers been for the people of their countries?

The Europeans were there to make a profit, the profits mostly came from agriculture, now these same countries (run by corrupt rulers who are rich anf fat0 are bankrupt, unable to feed themselves and asking the "White" nations of the world for handout. When was the last time a Muslim oraginised a Live Aid type event?

And I will not even touch on the genocide of black against black.

Their excuse is it's all the Whites fault. So why is India growing at such a rate and Africa is falling behind? Same situation different leaders and people.

Solution is put the Europeans back in charge. Nothing else will work for 99% of the black people in Africa. Unless they learn from South Africa.

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

O

The reality is the Whites will never go back and Africa will largely never recover. My solution is a dream.

Originally Posted by Paul Markham

So I'm unimformed. So tell me which countries in Africa are doing better under black rulers than white.

Point out the faults in my argumnet. Show me where the black leaders have improved life for their people more than he improved it for themselves. Show me where I'm wrong.