View Single Post
Old 11-03-2005, 01:48 PM  
ronaldo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: ICQ#: 272000271
Posts: 5,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegacy
By removing the term "actual" from the child pornography laws, anything that could be considered youthful or done in a fashion that implies youthful people engaging in any sexual activity including mere nudity would become a crime under this amendment.

Therefore a 25-30 year old woman wearing a plaid schoolgirl skirt and pigtails who only looks very young in a sexfilm would in fact be guilty of such child pornography violations because she is no longer an ACTUAL underage person, but an implied underage person due to her appearance and setting despite her actual age.
I don't see how they could possibly win that argument.

"Your honor WE think she LOOKS underage."

"Your honor WE think she looks 19 years old. Furthermore, WE can PROVE she's 25 years old."

Who would then decide how old someone looks? Utter bullshit.
ronaldo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote