Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pornguy
Catch on to something here. that is the finger that they are pointing at US!!! they are saying that we are involved, and that is the REASON for stricter 2257
|
This is correct pornguy! Some people in US law enforcement actually genuinely believe this to be the case as well. Their reasoning is they have seen it and investigated CP websites - they don't appear to make a distinction between porn sites too much and brand em all the same.
Just look at the action taken by DOJ on the original 2257 in effect now - they have had miniscule prosecutions under this code - even some of these were "deviant" in that the indictments were applied to instances well outside the area intended in under the original law.
Personally... I don't think the proposed new 2257 has anything to do with children. Powers exisited under the original law which were rarely implemented. The new 2257 is just a sick joke and another abuse of children by using them as the excuse.