NetRodent

It certainly seems suspicious, due to the fact that you're not known in the industry, you just registered today and you've only
posted about how great iBill is.



I think we've heard this one before. "No really, this time we mean it."



This is very suspicious wording, if you're not an agent of iBill.




Aren't the old owners the same as the new owners?




Then perhaps you should listen to those who have been around the block a time or two.




I'm happy for you. However if you're new, like you say, then the fact that you haven't
had problems doesn't count for much. A few on time payouts does not build much of a
reputation for reliability in light of iBill's continuing payment issues.



For someone who just processes with iBill, you sure seem awfully ferverant about spreading this message.



Your analogy is flawed. The Ford Pinto would be much more accurate...

The rush of the Pinto from conception to production was a recipe for disaster. Many studies have been
concluded by Mother Jones on Pinto accident reports which have revealed conclusively that if a Pinto being
followed at over 30 miles per hour was hit by that following vehicle, the rear end of the car would buckle
like an accordion, right up to the back seat. The tube leading to the gas-tank cap would be ripped away
from the tank itself, and gas would immediately begin sloshing onto the road around the car. The buckled
gas tank would be jammed up against the differential housing (the large bulge in the middle of the rear
axle), which contains four sharp, protruding bolts likely to gash holes in the tank and spill still more
gas. Now all that is needed is a spark from a cigarette, ignition, or scraping metal, and both cars would
be engulfed in flames. If a Pinto was struck from behind at higher speed say, at 40 mph chances are very
good that its doors would jam shut and its trapped passengers inside would burn to death.
(From: http://www.fordpinto.com/blowup.htm)


Of course not EVERY pinto blew up and killed its passengers, so lets give the Ford Pinto a second chance!!!!




So the forty two million dollars iBill owes is due to incorrect banking information? iBill would undoubtably
be aware that checks are getting returned and wires not going through, shouldn't they contact their customers when
they know there's a problem sending the payments?




But you're already admitted you're new. Plus nobody knows you, so unfortunately you don't have much credibility. Its good you're
had no problems with them, but don't expect other people to give what you say as much credence when it runs contrary to
the testimony of other people who are known and respected. The one post that Tony404 made saying he has been paid, does FAR more
to help iBill's case than ALL of the posts you've made.



For someone who just processes with iBill you're taking this awfully personally.



Why do you care so much?

I'd love nothing for there to be more than two viable North American IPSPs, however iBill is damaged goods. It will take
a lot for them to be credible again. They may be able to come back, but with the outstanding debts and the similarity
in management they're not looking too good.



At one time we accounted for about 1% of iBill's revenue and we've been paid most of what we're owed (except of course the web900).
However that doesn't change the fact that the way iBill handled the whole situation left a very bad taste in our mouths. We're
happy we got paid, but we're not particularly happy with iBill. This doesn't mean we are opposed to doing business with iBill again, but
its not worth the risk when there are other viable options out there.

__________________
"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."
--H.L. Mencken