Quote:
|
Originally Posted by subVERSION
Ok,
Seriously!? are we really even going to try to debate this subject when Creationism(ID)'s ONLY EVIDENCE is based upon a 2000+yr old book which was written, re-written, changed, and formatted 100's of times for that area & people's own structure of the belief system. Most importantly, this book has NO relation to most laws of life that we live by on a day-to-day basis.
Believe it, if it makes you happy and safe. I mean you should at least be a good person for yourself (and the people you love) and not for some tyrannical entity.
But how insulting is it to think you are putting this BS case up against scientific evidence in 1000's of areas with real substance that on it's own SAY EVERYTHING. Without the assumption or rendering of some asinine idea that would never fly in any other area of life.
I mean you don't even do that with any other information. So why would you go so backwards with somehting as this. Are you that insecure?
|
Again
Creationism DOES NOT EQUAL Biblism
Creationism is based on math or probability not on the bible.
Darwinism is based on the assumption that the enviroment in which evolution exists were created randomly. Whatever that probability is it is NOT 100%. Creationism is the remaining probability.
Darwinism is not a fact it is a theory, until the underlying assumption is proven to be true.
Scientific evidence (what a true scientist would call observed events) said that gravity was NOT a constant, That the smallest particle of Matter was electron. Scientific advancement was hindered in both cases because people took on faith that those assumptions were true, when in fact they were false.
Without quarks we would never have found anti-matter
How many scientific advancements are currently being lost because blind faith that Darwin's assumptions must be true.