Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gideongallery
You missed the point completely the enviroment that allows natural selection is statistically impossible. Increase or decrease the percentage (1.3 % high side) of carbon created by the big bang and environment prevents the evolution of anything greater that single celled organisms.
your doing the same thing Darwin did, ignoring the universe as a whole to validate your prefered theory.
|
Darwin wasn't trying to explain how the universe came into existence! He's starting from the position "the world does exist, what explains the huge diversity of wildlife"
There is no formula that will predict the exact amount of carbon required to produce single cell organims at the exclusion of multi-cellular organisms!
You do realise that prokaryotes and eukaryotes aren't all that different right?
"the enviroment that allows natural selection is statistically impossible."
What are you references for this statement? which peer reviewed journals published this? I'm pretty sure the environment I live in exists, so you must understand I'm quite sceptical that its existence is statistically impossible.