Quote:
Originally posted by quiet
if i make a coherent argument for anything under the sun, then state that i wish all retarded people were dead, that doesn't take *anything* away from my argument - ad hominem sucks.
|
The argument goes like this
a.. blaa blaa
b.. Moses blaa blaa
c... United Nations blaa blaa
====
conclusion: Mass desctruction in the area would be right.
But we know that the conclusion is wrong, thus some of the premises must be false, if he is giving a valid argument like you are suggesting.