Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

Now we know all that . but when this thread started we didnt know that yet , i'm just saying we should be carefull we have all the info first before blackballing people

Don't get me wrong i would feel the same way ( although there would be more sharp objects involved )

Shap says he didnt send the traffic to him though ( i think ? ) , i have no problem if someone charged back for an advertising campaign and wanting the money back from the company he was promoting , and i dont even have a problem with them directly paying you his money . I just have a problem with everyone else taking/seizing this guys money without first knowing the details.. In all fairness it looks like the guy was just an amateur who didnt spend his money wisely , and got pissed off , stupid thing to do , but doesnt look like he is a career fraudster either, he just doesnt understand that what he did was fraud. As mentioned i think first and foremost you should have him charged criminally , because its fraud. Then work out restitution after Part of his sentance may be to pay you back the money he charged back , then you will have his money and shap's money

Anyways , good to hear there is some resolution anyways