Originally Posted by Huggles

Somehow though, the hurricanes are only being produced in areas that hurricanes naturally form in. I mean, if a hurricane hit Seattle, L.A., New York, Washington D.C., and New Orleans at once, I'd worry.


Now, in this case, A MASSIVE hurricane hit Texas in 1963, and hurricanes have happened all up and down the gulf coast. These ARE areas that have been hit by hurricanes before. There are no NEW areas where hurricanes don't naturally form. So just taking those odds, those odd are:


Katrina, is it possible, just possible even a LITTLE bit, that it could have formed naturally?

Yes.

Rita, is it possible, just possible even a LITTLE bit, that it could have formed naturally?

Yes.


Ok, so let's consider your theory. For me to accept that your idea is possible, I have to also consider for sure that it is possible that it was natural as both of these hurricanes formed in areas that have been hit by powerful hurricanes before.

If this hurricane had hit Seattle, I would believe you.

How about consider global warming? Do you consider that as well? I would say, if I have to consider:


1. Naturally occuring hurricane
2. Weapon-made hurricane hitting areas of previous hurricanes
3. hurricanes produced by global warming effects

Which do you most believe? I'm asking the poster of this thread to put the above in the order of which he believes is most likely to have caused these hurricanes.