Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MetroPornTour
I just have one question.
The united states is accusing all these different nations of having weapons of Mass Destruction and demanding they get rid of them.
So does that mean the United States nuclear arsenaults are weapons of Mass Peace?
Or am I the only one that views this as hypocritical and wonders, "where does a country with nukes get off saying another country can't have nukes?"
|
dont confuse "hypocrisy" with "interests"
1) there are international agreements regarding arms proliferation, inspection etc etc and all this goes back a half a century - not a few years.
2) you can't fully disarm the US without fully disarming Russia being that the only deterrence to nuclear war is the idea of "mutually assured distruction" and its just the way it is.
3) fuck iran. the world is not going to be a better place with a 3rd world, unstable, nuclear theocracy/dictatorship.
4) the UN has tried and tried and tried to get involved with iran issue as well as the IAEA and all Iran does is lie about it. if the UN knows its a serious issue that demands the attention of the UN as does the IAEA... then someone has to be the ones to draw attention to it and get some action taken in the UN is not willing to grow some balls.
5) its really unfortuneate that the same idiots are trying to make the case against Iran as did against Iraq. thats a little insane to me. but it does not either change or diminish the seriousness of the issues at hand.