Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Theodor S. Geisel
Okay, follow this.
A previous host of yours went down at peak hours -- a host that cost you three times what you pay at Server Matrix.
That means, if I were to interpret, that Server Matrix is better IF Server Matrix hasn't gone down at peak hours. Let's just assume that's the case to get this flowing.
Also, one could interpret that EVEN THOUGH Server Matrix cost 1/3 that of a previous host of yours, Server Matrix is better. (That's essentially the same statement.)
What if there was a host that cost 1/3 that of Server Matrix and was better? Is that not worth checking out? Or is William Shatner wrong when he says it's brilliant to "shop and compare"?
|
the previous host did more work on the server but did not have the network and bandwidth providers that server matrix has.
the point is this. I did not do my homework and learned the hard way.